Remove custom standard lib

Why?? cause it was russian roulette with pointer access stuff etc

include/pd/core/u128.hpp

@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+#pragma once
+
+#include <pd/core/common.hpp>
+
+namespace PD {
+/**
+ * 128 Bit support for all platforms probably
+ * only used for flag checks in Keyboard/Mouse Input driver
+ */
+class u128 {
+ public:
+  u64 pLow = 0;
+  u64 pHigh = 0;
+
+  constexpr u128() : pLow(0), pHigh(0) {}
+  constexpr u128(u64 l, u64 h = 0) : pLow(l), pHigh(h) {}
+
+  /**
+   * Best way so far to create flags that go over 63
+   * like `1 << 65` is just `u128::Flag(65)`
+   */
+  constexpr static u128 Flag(u32 i) {
+    if (i < 64) {
+      return u128(1ULL << i, 0);
+    } else if (i < 128) {
+      return u128(0, 1ULL << (i - 64));
+    }
+    return u128();
+  }
+
+  constexpr u128 operator+(const u128& v) const {
+    u128 ret;
+    ret.pLow = pLow + v.pLow;
+    ret.pHigh = pHigh + v.pHigh + (ret.pLow < pLow);
+    return ret;
+  }
+
+  constexpr u128 operator&(const u128& v) const {
+    return u128(pLow & v.pLow, pHigh & v.pHigh);
+  }
+
+  constexpr u128 operator<<(u32 s) const {
+    if (s == 0) {
+      return *this;
+    }
+    if (s >= 128) {
+      return u128();
+    }
+    if (s >= 64) {
+      return u128(0, pLow << (s - 64));
+    }
+    return u128(pLow << s, (pHigh << s) | (pLow >> (64 - s)));
+  }
+
+  constexpr u128 operator>>(u32 s) const {
+    if (s == 0) {
+      return *this;
+    }
+    if (s >= 128) {
+      return u128();
+    }
+    if (s >= 64) {
+      return u128(pHigh >> (s - 64), 0);
+    }
+    return u128((pLow >> s) | (pHigh << (64 - s)), pHigh >> s);
+  }
+
+  constexpr u128& operator|=(const u128& v) {
+    pLow |= v.pLow;
+    pHigh |= v.pHigh;
+    return *this;
+  }
+
+  constexpr u128 operator|(const u128& v) const {
+    return u128(pLow | v.pLow, pHigh | v.pHigh);
+  }
+
+  constexpr u128& operator&=(const u128& v) {
+    pLow &= v.pLow;
+    pHigh &= v.pHigh;
+    return *this;
+  }
+
+  constexpr u128 operator~() const { return u128(~pLow, ~pHigh); }
+
+  /**
+   * Old why to make if checks possible
+   * Problem was that a operator& is required
+   * with u128 as result
+   */
+  // bool operator&(const u128& v) const {
+  //   return pLow & v.pLow || pHigh & v.pHigh;
+  // }
+
+  constexpr bool operator==(const u128& v) const {
+    return pLow == v.pLow && pHigh == v.pHigh;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Use explicit here to make sure it is only for checking and not for
+   * some error leading implicit bool assignments...
+   */
+  constexpr explicit operator bool() const { return pLow != 0 || pHigh != 0; }
+
+  /** Deprecated way to handle `flag & SomeFlag` */
+  constexpr bool Has(const u128& v) const {
+    return pLow & v.pLow || pHigh & v.pHigh;
+  }
+
+  constexpr bool operator!=(const u128& v) const { return !(*this == v); }
+};
+}  // namespace PD
+
+namespace std {
+/**
+ * Provide c++ STL support for unordered map to u128
+ */
+template <>
+struct hash<PD::u128> {
+  size_t operator()(const PD::u128& k) const {
+    // just combine hashes of the parts usign simple xor op
+    size_t h0 = std::hash<PD::u64>{}(k.pLow);
+    size_t h1 = std::hash<PD::u64>{}(k.pHigh);
+    return h0 ^ (h1 << 1);
+  }
+};
+}  // namespace std