tobid7/palladium
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 7 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

pd-ui7: Improve Container/Menu Centering API #1

New Issue
Open
opened 2025-02-28 11:41:51 +01:00 by tobid7 · 0 comments
tobid7 commented 2025-02-28 11:41:51 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Problem Description

Currently, creating UIs with centered objects is heavily hard-coded. This makes UI development more difficult and can lead to visual glitches.

Proposed Solution

  • Introduce parent containers that store position and size data.
  • These containers should handle centering or left-/right-alignment of their child objects.
  • After aligning the inner objects, the entire container should then be positioned on the screen.

Alternative Approach for Simple Cases

For simple cases, centering could be done by:

  • Calculating the maximum width within a given set of joined objects.
  • However, for more complex scenarios, a more efficient method is needed.

Next Steps

  • Implement parent containers for alignment.
  • Ensure UI7::Menu::JoinAlign correctly calculates the maximum width of the object set.
## **Problem Description** Currently, creating UIs with centered objects is heavily hard-coded. This makes UI development more difficult and can lead to visual glitches. ## **Proposed Solution** - Introduce **parent containers** that store position and size data. - These containers should handle **centering** or **left-/right-alignment** of their child objects. - After aligning the inner objects, the **entire container** should then be positioned on the screen. ### **Alternative Approach for Simple Cases** For simple cases, centering could be done by: - Calculating the **maximum width** within a given set of joined objects. - However, for more **complex scenarios**, a more efficient method is needed. ## **Next Steps** - Implement parent containers for alignment. - Ensure **`UI7::Menu::JoinAlign`** correctly calculates the maximum width of the object set.
tobid7 added the
Kind/Enhancement
Priority
High
 labels 2025-02-28 11:41:51 +01:00
tobid7 self-assigned this 2025-02-28 11:41:51 +01:00
tobid7 added the
Compat/Breaking
 label 2025-02-28 13:13:41 +01:00
tobid7 changed reference from rewrite to development 2025-03-06 08:37:30 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
development
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Compat/Breaking
Breaking change that won't be backward compatible
Kind/Bug
Something is not working
Kind/Documentation
Documentation changes
Kind/Enhancement
Improve existing functionality
Kind/Feature
New functionality
Kind/Security
This is security issue
Kind/Testing
Issue or pull request related to testing
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work
No Label
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Enhancement
Priority
High
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
tobid7
No Assignees tobid7
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: tobid7/palladium#1
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?